Graphics card comparison
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
Intel
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
0 Mb System Shared
Released 5 Sep 2014
DESKTOP
VS
AMD
Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
0 Mb System Shared
Released 11 Jun 2014
DESKTOP
Summary
Reasons to consider the Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Reasons to consider the Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
Our verdict
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Specifications
Core configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) |
|---|
| GPU Name | Broadwell GT3e () | Mullins () |
| Fab Process | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 49 mm² | 0 mm² |
| Transistors | 189 million | unknown |
| Shaders | 384 | 128 |
| Compute Units | 0 | 2 |
| Core clock | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | 4 |
| TMUs | 48 | 8 |
Memory configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Bus Width | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | 15 watts |
| Release Date | 5 Sep 2014 | 11 Jun 2014 |
Raw performance comparison
Pixel Rate
- Iris Pro Graphics 62001.80 GP/s
- Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)3.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Texel Rate
- Iris Pro Graphics 620014.40 GT/s
- Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)6.40 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Memory bandwidth
- Iris Pro Graphics 62000.00 GB/s
- Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)0.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Single precision performance
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200230.40 GFLOPs
- Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)204.80 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better