Graphics card comparison
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
Intel
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
0 Mb System Shared
Released 5 Sep 2014
DESKTOP
VS
AMD
Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
0 Mb System Shared
Released 14 Jun 2014
DESKTOP
Summary
Reasons to consider the Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Reasons to consider the Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
Our verdict
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Specifications
Core configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R5 Graphics IGP |
|---|
| GPU Name | Broadwell GT3e () | Mullins () |
| Fab Process | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 49 mm² | 0 mm² |
| Transistors | 189 million | unknown |
| Shaders | 384 | 128 |
| Compute Units | 0 | 2 |
| Core clock | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | 4 |
| TMUs | 48 | 8 |
Memory configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R5 Graphics IGP |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Bus Width | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R5 Graphics IGP |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | 15 watts |
| Release Date | 5 Sep 2014 | 14 Jun 2014 |
Raw performance comparison
Pixel Rate
- Iris Pro Graphics 62001.80 GP/s
- Radeon R5 Graphics IGP3.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Texel Rate
- Iris Pro Graphics 620014.40 GT/s
- Radeon R5 Graphics IGP6.40 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Memory bandwidth
- Iris Pro Graphics 62000.00 GB/s
- Radeon R5 Graphics IGP0.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Single precision performance
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200230.40 GFLOPs
- Radeon R5 Graphics IGP204.80 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better