Graphics card comparison
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GT 240
Intel
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
0 Mb System Shared
Released 5 Sep 2014
DESKTOP
VS
Nvidia
GeForce GT 240
1024 Mb GDDR5
Released 17 Nov 2009
DESKTOP
Summary
Reasons to consider the Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- 54 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GT 240 .
- This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Reasons to consider the GeForce GT 240
- Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
- PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor
Our verdict
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Specifications
Core configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GeForce GT 240 |
|---|
| GPU Name | Broadwell GT3e () | GT215 (GT215-450-A2) |
| Fab Process | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 49 mm² | 144 mm² |
| Transistors | 189 million | 727 million |
| Shaders | 384 | 96 |
| Compute Units | 0 | 4 |
| Core clock | 300 MHz | 550 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | 8 |
| TMUs | 48 | 32 |
Memory configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GeForce GT 240 |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | 850 MHz
3400 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | GeForce GT 240 |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | 69 watts |
| Release Date | 5 Sep 2014 | 17 Nov 2009 |
Raw performance comparison
Pixel Rate
- Iris Pro Graphics 62001.80 GP/s
- GeForce GT 2404.40 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Texel Rate
- Iris Pro Graphics 620014.40 GT/s
- GeForce GT 24017.60 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Memory bandwidth
- Iris Pro Graphics 62000.00 GB/s
- GeForce GT 24054.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Single precision performance
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200230.40 GFLOPs
- GeForce GT 240257.30 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better