Share

Graphics card comparison

Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) vs GeForce GT 240

AMD

Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)

0 Mb System Shared Released 11 Jun 2014 DESKTOP
Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
Nvidia

GeForce GT 240

1024 Mb GDDR5 Released 17 Nov 2009 DESKTOP
GeForce GT 240

Summary

Reasons to consider the Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)

  • 54 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GT 240 .
  • This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider the GeForce GT 240

  • Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
  • PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor
No winner
Our verdict

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.

Specifications

Core configuration

Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)GeForce GT 240
GPU NameMullins ()GT215 (GT215-450-A2)
Fab Process28 nm40 nm
Die Size0 mm²144 mm²
Transistorsunknown727 million
Shaders12896
Compute Units24
Core clock800 MHz550 MHz
ROPs48
TMUs832

Memory configuration

Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)GeForce GT 240
Memory TypeSystem SharedGDDR5
Bus WidthSystem Shared128 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Shared850 MHz
3400 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mb1024 Mb

Additional details

Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)GeForce GT 240
TDP15 watts69 watts
Release Date11 Jun 201417 Nov 2009

Raw performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)3.20 GP/s
  • GeForce GT 2404.40 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)6.40 GT/s
  • GeForce GT 24017.60 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GT 24054.40 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)204.80 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GT 240257.30 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Similar comparisons