Graphics card comparison
Radeon HD 6530D IGP vs Radeon R5 235X OEM
AMD
Radeon HD 6530D IGP
0 Mb System Shared
Released 20 Jun 2011
DESKTOP
VS
AMD
Radeon R5 235X OEM
1024 Mb DDR3
Released 21 Dec 2013
DESKTOP
Summary
Reasons to consider the Radeon HD 6530D IGP
- Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
Reasons to consider the Radeon R5 235X OEM
- 47 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 6530D IGP .
- This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
- Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
Our verdict
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Specifications
Core configuration
| Radeon HD 6530D IGP | Radeon R5 235X OEM |
|---|
| GPU Name | BeaverCreek () | Caicos (Caicos XT) |
| Fab Process | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 228 mm² | 67 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,450 million | 370 million |
| Shaders | 320 | 160 |
| Compute Units | 4 | 2 |
| Core clock | 443 MHz | 875 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 4 |
| TMUs | 16 | 8 |
Memory configuration
| Radeon HD 6530D IGP | Radeon R5 235X OEM |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 6530D IGP | Radeon R5 235X OEM |
|---|
| TDP | 65 watts | 18 watts |
| Release Date | 20 Jun 2011 | 21 Dec 2013 |
Raw performance comparison
Pixel Rate
- Radeon HD 6530D IGP3.54 GP/s
- Radeon R5 235X OEM3.50 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Texel Rate
- Radeon HD 6530D IGP7.09 GT/s
- Radeon R5 235X OEM7.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Memory bandwidth
- Radeon HD 6530D IGP0.00 GB/s
- Radeon R5 235X OEM14.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Single precision performance
- Radeon HD 6530D IGP283.50 GFLOPs
- Radeon R5 235X OEM280.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better