Graphics card comparison
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Nvidia
GeForce GTX 1650
4096 Mb GDDR5
Released 30 Apr 2019
DESKTOP
VS
Nvidia
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
3072 Mb GDDR5
Released 7 Nov 2013
DESKTOP
Summary
Gaming performance index
- GeForce GTX 1650104%
- GeForce GTX 780 Ti100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1650
- This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
- Supports PhysX
- Supports G-Sync
- Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
- Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
- Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
- Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- Supports PhysX
- Supports G-Sync
- Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
- Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications
Our verdict
No clear winner declared
These graphics cards seems to have comparable performance based on the game benchmark suite used (10 combinations of games and resolutions).
Specifications
Core configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU107 () | GK110B (GK110-425-B1) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | 561 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | 7,080 million |
| Shaders | 896 | 2880 |
| Compute Units | 14 | 15 |
| Core clock | 1485 MHz | 875 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48 |
| TMUs | 56 | 240 |
Memory configuration
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory Speed | 2000 MHz
8000 MHz effective | 1750 MHz
7000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 4096 Mb | 3072 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|
| TDP | 0 watts | 250 watts |
| Release Date | 30 Apr 2019 | 7 Nov 2013 |
Raw performance comparison
Pixel Rate
- GeForce GTX 165053.28 GP/s
- GeForce GTX 780 Ti52.50 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Texel Rate
- GeForce GTX 165093.24 GT/s
- GeForce GTX 780 Ti210.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Memory bandwidth
- GeForce GTX 1650128.00 GB/s
- GeForce GTX 780 Ti336.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Single precision performance
- GeForce GTX 16502984.00 GFLOPs
- GeForce GTX 780 Ti5040.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Game benchmarks
Grand Theft Auto V
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
- GeForce GTX 165077
- GeForce GTX 780 Ti74
FPS (higher is better)
Metro Exodus
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
- GeForce GTX 165022
- GeForce GTX 780 Ti25
FPS (higher is better)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
- GeForce GTX 165042
- GeForce GTX 780 Ti31
FPS (higher is better)
Strange Brigade
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
- GeForce GTX 165054
- GeForce GTX 780 Ti61
FPS (higher is better)
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
- GeForce GTX 165051
- GeForce GTX 780 Ti43
FPS (higher is better)
Grand Theft Auto V
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
- GeForce GTX 165049
- GeForce GTX 780 Ti52
FPS (higher is better)
Metro Exodus
Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64
- GeForce GTX 165017
- GeForce GTX 780 Ti19
FPS (higher is better)
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64
- GeForce GTX 165027
- GeForce GTX 780 Ti21
FPS (higher is better)
Strange Brigade
Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64
- GeForce GTX 165039
- GeForce GTX 780 Ti45
FPS (higher is better)
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
- GeForce GTX 165035
- GeForce GTX 780 Ti32
FPS (higher is better)