Share

Graphics card comparison

GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs GeForce GTX 970

Nvidia

GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

3072 Mb GDDR5 Released 18 Aug 2016 DESKTOP
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Nvidia

GeForce GTX 970

4096 Mb GDDR5 Released 19 Sep 2014 DESKTOP
GeForce GTX 970

Summary

Synthetic performance index

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB104%
  • GeForce GTX 970100%

Relative performance

Gaming performance index

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB109%
  • GeForce GTX 970100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

  • 9% higher gaming performance.
  • This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
  • Supports PhysX
  • Supports G-Sync
  • Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
  • Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
  • Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 970

  • Supports PhysX
  • Supports G-Sync
  • Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
  • Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Our verdict

HWSpot recommends the GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

The GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (23 combinations of games and resolutions).

Specifications

Core configuration

GeForce GTX 1060 3 GBGeForce GTX 970
GPU NameGP106 (GP106-300-A1)GM204 (GM204-200-A1)
Fab Process16 nm28 nm
Die Size200 mm²398 mm²
Transistors4,400 million5,200 million
Shaders11521664
Compute Units913
Core clock1506 MHz1050 MHz
ROPs4856
TMUs72104

Memory configuration

GeForce GTX 1060 3 GBGeForce GTX 970
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Bus Width192 bit256 bit
Memory Speed2002 MHz
8008 MHz effective
1753 MHz
7012 MHz effective
Memory Size3072 Mb4096 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GTX 1060 3 GBGeForce GTX 970
TDP120 watts148 watts
Release Date18 Aug 201619 Sep 2014

Raw performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB72.30 GP/s
  • GeForce GTX 97058.80 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB108.40 GT/s
  • GeForce GTX 970109.20 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB192.20 GB/s
  • GeForce GTX 970224.40 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB3470.00 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GTX 9703494.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Synthetic benchmarks

3DMark 11

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB16380
  • GeForce GTX 97015750

Points (higher is better)

Game benchmarks

Ashes Of The Singularity

DX12, High Quality, 8m samples, 2xMSAA

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB50
  • GeForce GTX 97041

FPS (higher is better)

Doom (2016)

OpenGL, Ultra Quality, SMAA 1tx

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB65
  • GeForce GTX 97058

FPS (higher is better)

Far Cry Primal

DX11, Very High Settings

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB45
  • GeForce GTX 97043

FPS (higher is better)

Hitman (2016)

DX12, Ultra Quality, MSAA, 16x AF

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB37
  • GeForce GTX 97037

FPS (higher is better)

Rise Of The Tomb Raider

DX12, Very High Details, Pure Hair On, HBAO+

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB46
  • GeForce GTX 97042

FPS (higher is better)

Thief 2014

DX11, Very High Details

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB49
  • GeForce GTX 97044

FPS (higher is better)

Tom Clancy's The Division

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB41
  • GeForce GTX 97040

FPS (higher is better)

Total War: Warhammer

DX12, Max Detail, FXAA, 16:1 AF

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB47
  • GeForce GTX 97045

FPS (higher is better)

Doom (2016)

OpenGL, Ultra Quality, SMAA 1tx

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB103
  • GeForce GTX 97091

FPS (higher is better)

Far Cry Primal

DX11, Very High Settings

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB66
  • GeForce GTX 97062

FPS (higher is better)

Hitman (2016)

DX12, Ultra Quality, MSAA, 16x AF

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB52
  • GeForce GTX 97053

FPS (higher is better)

Rise Of The Tomb Raider

DX12, Very High Details, Pure Hair On, HBAO+

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB70
  • GeForce GTX 97063

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest Detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB52
  • GeForce GTX 97044

FPS (higher is better)

Thief 2014

DX11, Very High Details

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB82
  • GeForce GTX 97061

FPS (higher is better)

Tom Clancy's The Division

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB58
  • GeForce GTX 97057

FPS (higher is better)

Total War: Warhammer

DX12, Max Detail, FXAA, 16:1 AF

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB68
  • GeForce GTX 97064

FPS (higher is better)

Doom (2016)

OpenGL, Ultra Quality, SMAA 1tx

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB33
  • GeForce GTX 97029

FPS (higher is better)

Far Cry Primal

DX11, Very High Settings

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB22
  • GeForce GTX 97023

FPS (higher is better)

Hitman (2016)

DX12, Ultra Quality, MSAA, 16x AF

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB22
  • GeForce GTX 97019

FPS (higher is better)

Rise Of The Tomb Raider

DX12, Very High Details, Pure Hair On, HBAO+

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB17
  • GeForce GTX 97019

FPS (higher is better)

Thief 2014

DX11, Very High Details

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB24
  • GeForce GTX 97024

FPS (higher is better)

Tom Clancy's The Division

DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB23
  • GeForce GTX 97018

FPS (higher is better)

Total War: Warhammer

DX12, Max Detail, FXAA, 16:1 AF

  • GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB26
  • GeForce GTX 97023

FPS (higher is better)

Similar comparisons