Share

Processor comparison

AMD E2-2000 vs Intel Core M-5Y51

AMD

AMD E2-2000

AMD Socket FT1 1750 MHz 2 cores Jan 2013 DESKTOP
AMD E2-2000
Intel

Intel Core M-5Y51

1100 MHz 2 cores Oct 2014 MOBILE
Intel Core M-5Y51

Summary

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-2000

  • Higher theoretical multi-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.

Reasons to consider the Intel Core M-5Y51

  • This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
  • Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.
Intel Core M-5Y51
Gaming

HWSpot recommends the Intel Core M-5Y51

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

No winner
Productivity

No clear winner declared

Specifications

Features

AMD E2-2000Intel Core M-5Y51
MMX
3DNow!
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4a
AMD64
PowerNow!
NX bit
AMD-V
SSE4.2
AVX
EIST
Intel 64
XD bit
VT-x
Hyper-Threading

Architecture

AMD E2-2000Intel Core M-5Y51
ArchitectureAMD BobcatIntel_Broadwell
MarketDesktopMobile
Memory SupportDDR3DDR4
CodenameZacateBroadwell-Y
Release DateJan 2013Oct 2014

Cores

AMD E2-2000Intel Core M-5Y51
Cores22
Threads24
SMPs11
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 7340Intel HD 5300

Cache

AMD E2-2000Intel Core M-5Y51
L1 Cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache512 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache0 KB4096 KB (shared)

Physical

AMD E2-2000Intel Core M-5Y51
SocketAMD Socket FT1
Max Case Temp100°Cunknown
PackageBGA2
Die Size75mm²50mm²
Process40 nm14 nm

Performance

AMD E2-2000Intel Core M-5Y51
Cpu Frequency1750 MHz1100 MHz
Turbo Clocknone2600 MHz
Base Clock200 MHz100 MHz
Voltage1.35 Vunknown
TDP18 W5 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • AMD E2-20001750 points
  • Intel Core M-5Y512912 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • AMD E2-20003500 points
  • Intel Core M-5Y512956 points

Points - higher is better

Similar comparisons