Graphics card comparison
Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs Radeon R5 220 OEM
AMD
Radeon HD 8400 IGP
0 Mb System Shared
Released 23 Nov 2013
DESKTOP
VS
AMD
Radeon R5 220 OEM
1024 Mb DDR3
Released 21 Dec 2013
DESKTOP
Summary
Reasons to consider the Radeon HD 8400 IGP
Reasons to consider the Radeon R5 220 OEM
- Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
Our verdict
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Specifications
Core configuration
| Radeon HD 8400 IGP | Radeon R5 220 OEM |
|---|
| GPU Name | Kalindi () | Cedar (Cedar PRO) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 110 mm² | 59 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,178 million | 292 million |
| Shaders | 128 | 80 |
| Compute Units | 2 | 2 |
| Core clock | 400 MHz | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | 8 |
Memory configuration
| Radeon HD 8400 IGP | Radeon R5 220 OEM |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | 533 MHz
1066 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 8400 IGP | Radeon R5 220 OEM |
|---|
| TDP | 25 watts | 19 watts |
| Release Date | 23 Nov 2013 | 21 Dec 2013 |
Raw performance comparison
Pixel Rate
- Radeon HD 8400 IGP1.60 GP/s
- Radeon R5 220 OEM2.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Texel Rate
- Radeon HD 8400 IGP3.20 GT/s
- Radeon R5 220 OEM5.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Memory bandwidth
- Radeon HD 8400 IGP0.00 GB/s
- Radeon R5 220 OEM8.53 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Single precision performance
- Radeon HD 8400 IGP102.40 GFLOPs
- Radeon R5 220 OEM104.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better