Graphics card comparison
Radeon HD 3650 vs GeForce GT 230
AMD
Radeon HD 3650
256 Mb GDDR3
Released 20 Jan 2008
DESKTOP
VS
Nvidia
GeForce GT 230
512 Mb GDDR3
Released 12 Oct 2009
DESKTOP
Summary
Reasons to consider the Radeon HD 3650
- Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
Reasons to consider the GeForce GT 230
- This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
- Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
- PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor
Our verdict
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Specifications
Core configuration
| Radeon HD 3650 | GeForce GT 230 |
| GPU Name | RV635 (RV635 PRO) | G94B (G94-300-B1) |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 135 mm² | 196 mm² |
| Transistors | 378 million | 505 million |
| Shaders | 120 | 48 |
| Compute Units | 3 | 3 |
| Core clock | 725 MHz | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | 16 |
| TMUs | 8 | 24 |
Memory configuration
| Radeon HD 3650 | GeForce GT 230 |
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 256 Mb | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 3650 | GeForce GT 230 |
| TDP | 65 watts | 75 watts |
| Release Date | 20 Jan 2008 | 12 Oct 2009 |
Raw performance comparison
Pixel Rate
- Radeon HD 36502.90 GP/s
- GeForce GT 23010.40 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Texel Rate
- Radeon HD 36505.80 GT/s
- GeForce GT 23015.60 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Memory bandwidth
- Radeon HD 365025.60 GB/s
- GeForce GT 23057.60 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Single precision performance
- Radeon HD 3650174.00 GFLOPs
- GeForce GT 230156.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better