Share

Graphics card comparison

GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs Radeon RX Vega 56

Nvidia

GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

8192 Mb GDDR6 Released 4 Jan 2022 DESKTOP
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 56

8192 Mb HBM2 Released 8 Aug 2017 DESKTOP
Radeon RX Vega 56

Summary

Gaming performance index

  • GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB798%
  • Radeon RX Vega 56100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

  • 698% higher gaming performance.
  • 80 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon RX Vega 56 .
  • This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
  • Supports PhysX
  • Supports G-Sync
  • Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
  • Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
  • Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
  • Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX Vega 56

  • Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
  • Supports FreeSync
  • Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
  • Supports TrueAudio
  • Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications
No winner
Our verdict

No clear winner declared

These graphics cards seems to have comparable performance based on the game benchmark suite used (10 combinations of games and resolutions).

Specifications

Core configuration

GeForce RTX 3050 8 GBRadeon RX Vega 56
GPU NameGA106 (GA106-150-A1)Vega 10 (Vega 10 XL)
Fab Process8 nm14 nm
Die Size276 mm²484 mm²
Transistors13,250 million12,500 million
Shaders25603584
Compute Units2056
Core clock1552 MHz1156 MHz
ROPs4864
TMUs80224

Memory configuration

GeForce RTX 3050 8 GBRadeon RX Vega 56
Memory TypeGDDR6HBM2
Bus Width128 bit2048 bit
Memory Speed1750 MHz
14 Gbps effective
800 MHz
1600 MHz effective
Memory Size8192 Mb8192 Mb

Additional details

GeForce RTX 3050 8 GBRadeon RX Vega 56
TDP130 watts210 watts
Release Date4 Jan 20228 Aug 2017

Raw performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB85.30 GP/s
  • Radeon RX Vega 5694.14 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB142.20 GT/s
  • Radeon RX Vega 56329.50 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB224.00 GB/s
  • Radeon RX Vega 56409.60 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB9098.00 GFLOPs
  • Radeon RX Vega 5610544.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Game benchmarks

Assassins Creed: Valhalla

Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11

  • GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB56
  • Radeon RX Vega 5657

FPS (higher is better)

Far Cry 6

Ultra High Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB71
  • Radeon RX Vega 561

FPS (higher is better)

Hitman III

Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11

  • GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB123
  • Radeon RX Vega 56139

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

  • GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB90
  • Radeon RX Vega 5681

FPS (higher is better)

Assassins Creed: Valhalla

Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11

  • GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB43
  • Radeon RX Vega 5645

FPS (higher is better)

Hitman III

Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11

  • GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB80
  • Radeon RX Vega 5688

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

  • GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB60
  • Radeon RX Vega 5654

FPS (higher is better)

Assassins Creed: Valhalla

Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11

  • GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB26
  • Radeon RX Vega 5627

FPS (higher is better)

Hitman III

Ultra quality - DirectX12 Windows 11

  • GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB41
  • Radeon RX Vega 5648

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

  • GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB31
  • Radeon RX Vega 5628

FPS (higher is better)

Similar comparisons