Share

Graphics card comparison

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs Radeon RX 6400

Nvidia

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

4096 Mb GDDR6 Released 27 Jan 2022 DESKTOP
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
AMD

Radeon RX 6400

4096 Mb GDDR6 Released UNRELEASED DESKTOP
Radeon RX 6400

Summary

Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

  • Supports PhysX
  • Supports G-Sync
  • Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
  • Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
  • Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
  • Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)

Reasons to consider the Radeon RX 6400

  • Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
  • Supports FreeSync
  • Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
  • Infinity Cache allows to deliver up to 3.25x the effective memory bandwidth
  • Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
No winner
Our verdict

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.

Specifications

Core configuration

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GBRadeon RX 6400
GPU NameGA106 (GA106-140-A1)Navi 24 (Navi 24 XL)
Fab Process8 nm6 nm
Die Size276 mm²107 mm²
Transistors13,250 million5,400 million
Shaders2304768
Compute Units1812
Core clock1545 MHz1800 MHz
ROPs4032
TMUs7248

Memory configuration

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GBRadeon RX 6400
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Bus Width128 bit64 bit
Memory Speed1750 MHz
14 Gbps effective
1750 MHz
14 Gbps effective
Memory Size4096 Mb4096 Mb

Additional details

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GBRadeon RX 6400
TDP90 watts100 watts
Release Date27 Jan 2022UNRELEASED

Raw performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB69.60 GP/s
  • Radeon RX 640064.00 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB125.30 GT/s
  • Radeon RX 640096.00 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB224.00 GB/s
  • Radeon RX 6400112.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB8018.00 GFLOPs
  • Radeon RX 64003072.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Similar comparisons