Graphics card comparison
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R9 270X
Nvidia
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
2048 Mb GDDR5
Released 18 Feb 2014
DESKTOP
VS
AMD
Radeon R9 270X
2048 Mb GDDR5
Released 8 Oct 2013
DESKTOP
Summary
Synthetic performance index
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti100%
- Radeon R9 270X155%
Relative performance
Gaming performance index
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti100%
- Radeon R9 270X125%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- 120 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon R9 270X .
- Supports PhysX
- Supports G-Sync
- Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
- Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications
Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 270X
- 25% higher gaming performance.
- Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
- Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
- Supports Mantle
- Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications
Our verdict
HWSpot recommends the Radeon R9 270X
The Radeon R9 270X is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (9 combinations of games and resolutions).
Specifications
Core configuration
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|
| GPU Name | GM107 (GM107-400-A2) | Curacao (Curacao XT) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 148 mm² | 212 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,870 million | 2,800 million |
| Shaders | 640 | 1280 |
| Compute Units | 5 | 20 |
| Core clock | 1020 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 |
| TMUs | 40 | 80 |
Memory configuration
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1350 MHz
5400 MHz effective | 1400 MHz
5600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 2048 Mb | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|
| TDP | 60 watts | 180 watts |
| Release Date | 18 Feb 2014 | 8 Oct 2013 |
Raw performance comparison
Pixel Rate
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti16.32 GP/s
- Radeon R9 270X32.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Texel Rate
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti40.80 GT/s
- Radeon R9 270X80.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Memory bandwidth
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti86.40 GB/s
- Radeon R9 270X179.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Single precision performance
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti1305.60 GFLOPs
- Radeon R9 270X2560.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Synthetic benchmarks
3DMark 11
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti5610
- Radeon R9 270X8700
Points (higher is better)
Game benchmarks
Battlefield 4
DX11, Ultra Quality,2x MSAA,16x AF, HBAO
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti37
- Radeon R9 270X53
FPS (higher is better)
Bioshock Infinite
DX11, Ultra Quality,DDOD, FX AA
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti48
- Radeon R9 270X52
FPS (higher is better)
Crysis 3
DX11,Very High Quality, FXAA
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti25
- Radeon R9 270X33
FPS (higher is better)
Hitman Absolution
DX11, High Quality, 2x MSAA, 16x AF
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti36
- Radeon R9 270X52
FPS (higher is better)
Medal Of Honor Warfighter
DX11, Ultra Quality, 4xMSAA
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti36
- Radeon R9 270X48
FPS (higher is better)
Bioshock Infinite
DX11, Ultra, DDOD, FXAA
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti30
- Radeon R9 270X34
FPS (higher is better)
Grand Theft Auto V
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti23
- Radeon R9 270X28
FPS (higher is better)
Hitman Absolution
DX11, High Quality, 2x MSAA, 16x AF
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti36
- Radeon R9 270X39
FPS (higher is better)
Grand Theft Auto V
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
- GeForce GTX 750 Ti34
- Radeon R9 270X42
FPS (higher is better)