Share

Graphics card comparison

GeForce GTX 690 vs Radeon R9 280X

Nvidia

GeForce GTX 690

2048 Mb GDDR5 Released 3 May 2012 DESKTOP
GeForce GTX 690
AMD

Radeon R9 280X

3072 Mb GDDR5 Released 8 Oct 2013 DESKTOP
Radeon R9 280X

Summary

Synthetic performance index

  • GeForce GTX 690162%
  • Radeon R9 280X100%

Relative performance

Gaming performance index

  • GeForce GTX 690146%
  • Radeon R9 280X100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 690

  • 46% higher gaming performance.
  • Supports PhysX
  • Supports G-Sync
  • Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
  • Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 280X

  • 50 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 690 .
  • This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
  • Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
  • Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
  • Supports Mantle
  • Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications
GeForce GTX 690
Our verdict

HWSpot recommends the GeForce GTX 690

The GeForce GTX 690 is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (5 combinations of games and resolutions).

Specifications

Core configuration

GeForce GTX 690Radeon R9 280X
GPU NameGK104 (GK104-355-A2)Tahiti (Tahiti XTL)
Fab Process28 nm28 nm
Die Size294 mm²352 mm²
Transistors3,540 million4,313 million
Shaders15362048
Compute Units832
Core clock915 MHz850 MHz
ROPs3232
TMUs128128

Memory configuration

GeForce GTX 690Radeon R9 280X
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Bus Width256 bit x2384 bit
Memory Speed1502 MHz
6008 MHz effective
1500 MHz
6000 MHz effective
Memory Size2048 Mb3072 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GTX 690Radeon R9 280X
TDP300 watts250 watts
Release Date3 May 20128 Oct 2013

Raw performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 69058.60 GP/s
  • Radeon R9 280X27.20 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 690234.00 GT/s
  • Radeon R9 280X109.00 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GTX 690384.00 GB/s
  • Radeon R9 280X288.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GTX 6905622.00 GFLOPs
  • Radeon R9 280X3482.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Synthetic benchmarks

3DMark 11

  • GeForce GTX 69017860
  • Radeon R9 280X10960

Points (higher is better)

Game benchmarks

Battlefield 4

DX11, Ultra Quality,2x MSAA,16x AF, HBAO

  • GeForce GTX 69098
  • Radeon R9 280X72

FPS (higher is better)

Bioshock Infinite

DX11, Ultra Quality,DDOD, FX AA

  • GeForce GTX 690118
  • Radeon R9 280X69

FPS (higher is better)

Crysis 3

DX11,Very High Quality, FXAA

  • GeForce GTX 69078
  • Radeon R9 280X42

FPS (higher is better)

Hitman Absolution

DX11, High Quality, 2x MSAA, 16x AF

  • GeForce GTX 69072
  • Radeon R9 280X69

FPS (higher is better)

Metro Last Light

DX11, AAA standard, 16xAF, Motion Blur normal, Tesselation normal

  • GeForce GTX 69068
  • Radeon R9 280X50

FPS (higher is better)

Similar comparisons