Graphics card comparison
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs GeForce GTX TITAN X
Nvidia
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
6144 Mb GDDR6
Released 22 Feb 2019
DESKTOP
VS
Nvidia
GeForce GTX TITAN X
12288 Mb GDDR5
Released 17 Mar 2015
DESKTOP
Summary
Gaming performance index
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti100%
- GeForce GTX TITAN X101%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- 130 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX TITAN X .
- This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
- Supports PhysX
- Supports G-Sync
- Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
- Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
- Supports DirectX Raytracing (DXR)
- Supports Deep Learning Super-Sampling (DLSS)
Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX TITAN X
- Supports PhysX
- Supports G-Sync
- Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
- Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications
Our verdict
No clear winner declared
These graphics cards seems to have comparable performance based on the game benchmark suite used (6 combinations of games and resolutions).
Specifications
Core configuration
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|
| GPU Name | TU116 (TU116-400-A1) | GM200 (GM200-400-A1) |
| Fab Process | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 284 mm² | 601 mm² |
| Transistors | 6,600 million | 8,000 million |
| Shaders | 1536 | 3072 |
| Compute Units | 24 | 24 |
| Core clock | 1500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96 |
| TMUs | 96 | 192 |
Memory configuration
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1500 MHz
12000 MHz effective | 1753 MHz
7012 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 6144 Mb | 12288 Mb |
Additional details
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce GTX TITAN X |
|---|
| TDP | 120 watts | 250 watts |
| Release Date | 22 Feb 2019 | 17 Mar 2015 |
Raw performance comparison
Pixel Rate
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti84.96 GP/s
- GeForce GTX TITAN X96.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Texel Rate
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti169.90 GT/s
- GeForce GTX TITAN X192.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Memory bandwidth
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti288.00 GB/s
- GeForce GTX TITAN X337.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Single precision performance
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti5437.00 GFLOPs
- GeForce GTX TITAN X6144.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Game benchmarks
Grand Theft Auto V
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti124
- GeForce GTX TITAN X130
FPS (higher is better)
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti91
- GeForce GTX TITAN X82
FPS (higher is better)
Grand Theft Auto V
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti94
- GeForce GTX TITAN X94
FPS (higher is better)
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti64
- GeForce GTX TITAN X64
FPS (higher is better)
Grand Theft Auto V
DX11, Max Details, 16:1 AF, 2xMSAA
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti47
- GeForce GTX TITAN X48
FPS (higher is better)
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
DX11,Max Details, 16:1 HQ-AF, +AA
- GeForce GTX 1660 Ti34
- GeForce GTX TITAN X39
FPS (higher is better)