Share

Graphics card comparison

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 Nano

Nvidia

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

4096 Mb GDDR6 Released 22 Nov 2019 DESKTOP
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMD

Radeon R9 Nano

4096 Mb HBM Released 27 Aug 2015 DESKTOP
Radeon R9 Nano

Summary

Gaming performance index

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER109%
  • Radeon R9 Nano100%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

  • 9% higher gaming performance.
  • 75 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon R9 Nano .
  • This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
  • Supports PhysX
  • Supports G-Sync
  • Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
  • Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
  • Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider the Radeon R9 Nano

  • Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
  • Supports FreeSync
  • Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
  • Supports TrueAudio
  • Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Our verdict

HWSpot recommends the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (12 combinations of games and resolutions).

Specifications

Core configuration

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERRadeon R9 Nano
GPU NameTU116 ()Fiji (Fiji XT CA)
Fab Process12 nm28 nm
Die Size284 mm²596 mm²
Transistors6,600 million8,900 million
Shaders12804096
Compute Units2064
Core clock1530 MHz1000 MHz
ROPs3264
TMUs80256

Memory configuration

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERRadeon R9 Nano
Memory TypeGDDR6HBM
Bus Width128 bit4096 bit
Memory Speed1500 MHz
12000 MHz effective
500 MHz
1000 MHz effective
Memory Size4096 Mb4096 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERRadeon R9 Nano
TDP100 watts175 watts
Release Date22 Nov 201927 Aug 2015

Raw performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER55.20 GP/s
  • Radeon R9 Nano64.00 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER138.00 GT/s
  • Radeon R9 Nano256.00 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER192.00 GB/s
  • Radeon R9 Nano512.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER4416.00 GFLOPs
  • Radeon R9 Nano8192.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Game benchmarks

Battlefield V

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER70
  • Radeon R9 Nano46

FPS (higher is better)

Borderlands 3

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER43
  • Radeon R9 Nano39

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest Details, Pure hair, HBAO+, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER66
  • Radeon R9 Nano50

FPS (higher is better)

Strange Brigade

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER79
  • Radeon R9 Nano93

FPS (higher is better)

Battlefield V

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER53
  • Radeon R9 Nano37

FPS (higher is better)

Borderlands 3

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER30
  • Radeon R9 Nano29

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER42
  • Radeon R9 Nano35

FPS (higher is better)

Strange Brigade

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER57
  • Radeon R9 Nano69

FPS (higher is better)

Battlefield V

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER28
  • Radeon R9 Nano26

FPS (higher is better)

Borderlands 3

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER15
  • Radeon R9 Nano17

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER18
  • Radeon R9 Nano16

FPS (higher is better)

Strange Brigade

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER32
  • Radeon R9 Nano45

FPS (higher is better)

Similar comparisons