Share

Graphics card comparison

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Nvidia

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

4096 Mb GDDR6 Released 22 Nov 2019 DESKTOP
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Nvidia

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

6144 Mb GDDR5 Released 2 Jun 2015 DESKTOP
GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Summary

Gaming performance index

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER100%
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti115%

Relative performance

Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

  • 150 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 980 Ti .
  • This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
  • Supports PhysX
  • Supports G-Sync
  • Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
  • Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
  • Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Pascal), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Reasons to consider the GeForce GTX 980 Ti

  • 15% higher gaming performance.
  • Supports PhysX
  • Supports G-Sync
  • Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
  • Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Our verdict

HWSpot recommends the GeForce GTX 980 Ti

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is the better performing card based on the game benchmark suite used (18 combinations of games and resolutions).

Specifications

Core configuration

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce GTX 980 Ti
GPU NameTU116 ()GM200 (GM200-310-A1)
Fab Process12 nm28 nm
Die Size284 mm²601 mm²
Transistors6,600 million8,000 million
Shaders12802816
Compute Units2022
Core clock1530 MHz1000 MHz
ROPs3296
TMUs80176

Memory configuration

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce GTX 980 Ti
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5
Bus Width128 bit384 bit
Memory Speed1500 MHz
12000 MHz effective
1753 MHz
7012 MHz effective
Memory Size4096 Mb6144 Mb

Additional details

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce GTX 980 Ti
TDP100 watts250 watts
Release Date22 Nov 20192 Jun 2015

Raw performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER55.20 GP/s
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti96.00 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER138.00 GT/s
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti176.00 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER192.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti337.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER4416.00 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti5632.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better

Game benchmarks

Battlefield V

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER70
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti55

FPS (higher is better)

Death Stranding

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER57
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti87

FPS (higher is better)

Far Cry New Dawn

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER74
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti83

FPS (higher is better)

Metro Exodus

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER39
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti42

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER66
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti66

FPS (higher is better)

Strange Brigade

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER79
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti95

FPS (higher is better)

Battlefield V

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER53
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti39

FPS (higher is better)

Death Stranding

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER49
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti62

FPS (higher is better)

Far Cry New Dawn

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER54
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti62

FPS (higher is better)

Metro Exodus

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER31
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti33

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER42
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti45

FPS (higher is better)

Strange Brigade

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER57
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti69

FPS (higher is better)

Battlefield V

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER28
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti32

FPS (higher is better)

Death Stranding

Very High Quality TAA, DirectX12, Windows 10 x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER27
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti35

FPS (higher is better)

Far Cry New Dawn

Ultra Quality, DirectX11, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER26
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti35

FPS (higher is better)

Metro Exodus

Ultra Detail,16:1 AF, DirectX12, Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER16
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti21

FPS (higher is better)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Highest detail, Pure Hair On, HBAO+, DirectX 12, Windows 11 x 64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER18
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti23

FPS (higher is better)

Strange Brigade

Ultra Quality, DirectX12, Async Compute ,Windows 10x64

  • GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER32
  • GeForce GTX 980 Ti40

FPS (higher is better)

Similar comparisons