Processor comparison
Intel Xeon E5-2680 vs Intel Core M-5Y31
Intel
Intel Xeon E5-2680
Intel Socket 2011
2700 MHz
8 cores
Mar 2012
SERVER
VS
Intel
Intel Core M-5Y31
900 MHz
2 cores
Oct 2014
MOBILE
Summary
Synthetic performance index
- Intel Xeon E5-2680384%
- Intel Core M-5Y31100%
Relative performance
Single thread performance index
- Intel Xeon E5-2680120%
- Intel Core M-5Y31100%
Relative performance
Multi thread performance index
- Intel Xeon E5-2680516%
- Intel Core M-5Y31100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2680
- Much higher single threaded performance (around 20% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
- Much higher multi threaded performance (around 416% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
- Around 284% higher average synthetic performance.
Reasons to consider the Intel Core M-5Y31
- 125 watts lower power draw.
- This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
- Has an integrated GPU, which allows to run the system without a dedicated graphics card, unlike the Intel Xeon E5-2680.
Gaming
HWSpot recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2680
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWSpot recommends the Intel Xeon E5-2680
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Specifications
Features
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 | Intel Core M-5Y31 |
|---|
| MMX | | |
| SSE | | |
| SSE2 | | |
| SSE3 | | |
| SSSE3 | | |
| SSE4.2 | | |
| AVX | | |
| EIST | | |
| Intel 64 | | |
| XD bit | | |
| TXT | | |
| Intel VT-x | | |
| Intel VT-d | | |
| Hyper-Threading | | |
| AES-NI | | |
| 8.0GT/s QPI | | |
| VT-x | | |
Architecture
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 | Intel Core M-5Y31 |
|---|
| Architecture | Intel_SandyBridge | Intel_Broadwell |
| Market | Server | Mobile |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP | Broadwell-Y |
| Release Date | Mar 2012 | Oct 2014 |
Cores
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 | Intel Core M-5Y31 |
|---|
| Cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| SMPs | 2 | 1 |
| Integrated Graphics | No | Intel HD 5300 |
Cache
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 | Intel Core M-5Y31 |
|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 20480 KB (shared) | 4096 KB (shared) |
Physical
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 | Intel Core M-5Y31 |
|---|
| Socket | Intel Socket 2011 | |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | unknown |
| Package | FC-LGA10 | |
| Die Size | 435mm² | 50mm² |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Performance
| Intel Xeon E5-2680 | Intel Core M-5Y31 |
|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 2700 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 3500 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Voltage | 1.35 V | unknown |
| TDP | 130 W | 5 W |
Raw performance index
Raw single-thread performance estimation
- Intel Xeon E5-26803500 points
- Intel Core M-5Y312688 points
Points - higher is better
Raw multi-thread performance estimation
- Intel Xeon E5-268025920 points
- Intel Core M-5Y312419 points
Points - higher is better
Synthetic benchmarks
3DMark06 CPU
- Intel Xeon E5-26807924
- Intel Core M-5Y312589
points - higher is better
Cinebench R10 32Bit Single
- Intel Xeon E5-26804118
- Intel Core M-5Y313395.5
points - higher is better
Cinebench R10 32Bit Multi
- Intel Xeon E5-268026801
- Intel Core M-5Y316563
points - higher is better
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
- Intel Xeon E5-26801.26
- Intel Core M-5Y311.09
points - higher is better
Cinebench R11.5 64Bit
- Intel Xeon E5-268011.95
- Intel Core M-5Y312.2
points - higher is better
SuperPI 1M
- Intel Xeon E5-268012
- Intel Core M-5Y3115.9
seconds - lower is better
TrueCrypt AES
- Intel Xeon E5-26800.34
- Intel Core M-5Y311.2
GB/s
TrueCrypt Twofish
- Intel Xeon E5-26800.54
- Intel Core M-5Y310.2
GB/s
TrueCrypt Serpent
- Intel Xeon E5-26801.7
- Intel Core M-5Y310.11
GB/s