Processor comparison
Intel Core i5-4690K vs Intel Core i3-6100
Intel
Intel Core i5-4690K
Intel Socket 1150
3500 MHz
4 cores
Jun 2014
DESKTOP
VS
Intel
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Socket 1151
3700 MHz
2 cores
Sep 2015
DESKTOP
Summary
Synthetic performance index
- Intel Core i5-4690K125%
- Intel Core i3-6100100%
Relative performance
Single thread performance index
- Intel Core i5-4690K100%
- Intel Core i3-6100104%
Relative performance
Multi thread performance index
- Intel Core i5-4690K145%
- Intel Core i3-6100100%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-4690K
- Much higher multi threaded performance (around 45% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
- Around 25% higher average synthetic performance.
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-6100
- This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
Gaming
HWSpot recommends the Intel Core i5-4690K
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWSpot recommends the Intel Core i5-4690K
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Specifications
Features
| Intel Core i5-4690K | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|
| MMX | | |
| SSE | | |
| SSE2 | | |
| SSE3 | | |
| SSSE3 | | |
| SSE4.2 | | |
| AVX | | |
| AVX2 | | |
| EIST | | |
| Intel 64 | | |
| XD bit | | |
| VT-x | | |
| AES-NI | | |
| CLMUL | | |
| FMA3 | | |
| F16C | | |
| BMI1 | | |
| BMI2 | | |
| Boost 2.0 | | |
| SSE4.1 | | |
| Hyper-Threading | | |
| TSX | | |
Architecture
| Intel Core i5-4690K | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|
| Architecture | Intel_Haswell | Intel_Skylake |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR3, DDR4 |
| Codename | Haswell | Skylake |
| Release Date | Jun 2014 | Sep 2015 |
Cores
| Intel Core i5-4690K | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| SMPs | 1 | 1 |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 | Intel HD 530 |
Cache
| Intel Core i5-4690K | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 4096 KB (shared) |
Physical
| Intel Core i5-4690K | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|
| Socket | Intel Socket 1150 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Max Case Temp | 72°C | 65°C |
| Package | FC-LGA12C | |
| Die Size | 177mm² | 150mm² |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm |
Performance
| Intel Core i5-4690K | Intel Core i3-6100 |
|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 3500 MHz | 3700 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 3900 MHz | none |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Voltage | unknown | unknown |
| TDP | 88 W | 51 W |
Raw performance index
Raw single-thread performance estimation
- Intel Core i5-4690K4368 points
- Intel Core i3-61004255 points
Points - higher is better
Raw multi-thread performance estimation
- Intel Core i5-4690K15680 points
- Intel Core i3-610010297 points
Points - higher is better
Synthetic benchmarks
GeekBench 3 (32-bit Multi Core)
- Intel Core i5-4690K11931
- Intel Core i3-61008336
points - higher is better
GeekBench 3 (64-bit Single Core)
- Intel Core i5-4690K4110
- Intel Core i3-61004975
points - higher is better
GeekBench 3 (64-bit Multi Core)
- Intel Core i5-4690K13301
- Intel Core i3-610010509
points - higher is better
GeekBench 3 (32-bit Single Core)
- Intel Core i5-4690K3722
- Intel Core i3-61003934
points - higher is better
Rendering: POV-Ray 3.7
- Intel Core i5-4690K1432
- Intel Core i3-6100877
points per second - higher is better
7-zip
- Intel Core i5-4690K17256
- Intel Core i3-610011393
MIPS - higher is better
3D Particle Movement (Single Threaded)
- Intel Core i5-4690K129.19
- Intel Core i3-6100123.44
points - higher is better
3D Particle Movement (Multi Threaded)
- Intel Core i5-4690K412.89
- Intel Core i3-6100370.03
points - higher is better
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
- Intel Core i5-4690K568
- Intel Core i3-6100321
points - higher is better
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
- Intel Core i5-4690K (simulated)158.17
- Intel Core i3-6100154
points - higher is better