Processor comparison
Intel Celeron 887 vs Intel Atom Z3770
Intel
Intel Celeron 887
Intel BGA1023
1500 MHz
2 cores
Sep 2012
MOBILE
VS
Intel
Intel Atom Z3770
Intel BGA1380
1467 MHz
4 cores
Sep 2013
MOBILE
Summary
Synthetic performance index
- Intel Celeron 887100%
- Intel Atom Z3770194%
Relative performance
Single thread performance index
- Intel Celeron 887134%
- Intel Atom Z3770100%
Relative performance
Multi thread performance index
- Intel Celeron 887100%
- Intel Atom Z3770247%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 887
- Much higher single threaded performance (around 34% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom Z3770
- Much higher multi threaded performance (around 147% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
- Around 94% higher average synthetic performance.
Gaming
HWSpot recommends the Intel Atom Z3770
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWSpot recommends the Intel Atom Z3770
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Specifications
Features
| Intel Celeron 887 | Intel Atom Z3770 |
|---|
| MMX | | |
| SSE | | |
| SSE2 | | |
| SSE3 | | |
| SSSE3 | | |
| SSE4.1 | | |
| SSE4.2 | | |
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST) | | |
| Intel 64 | | |
| XD bit (an NX bit implementation) | | |
| Intel VT-x | | |
| Smart Cache. | | |
| EIST | | |
| XD bit | | |
| BPT | | |
Architecture
| Intel Celeron 887 | Intel Atom Z3770 |
|---|
| Architecture | Intel_SandyBridge | Intel_Silvermont |
| Market | Mobile | Mobile |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Codename | Sandy Bridge | Bay Trail-T |
| Release Date | Sep 2012 | Sep 2013 |
Cores
| Intel Celeron 887 | Intel Atom Z3770 |
|---|
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| SMPs | 1 | 1 |
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | HD Graphics |
Cache
| Intel Celeron 887 | Intel Atom Z3770 |
|---|
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 2048 KB (shared) | 0 KB |
Physical
| Intel Celeron 887 | Intel Atom Z3770 |
|---|
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | Intel BGA1380 |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | unknown |
| Package | rPGA | FC-BGA1380 |
| Die Size | 131mm² | unknown |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm |
Performance
| Intel Celeron 887 | Intel Atom Z3770 |
|---|
| Cpu Frequency | 1500 MHz | 1467 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | none | 2400 MHz |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 133 MHz |
| Voltage | unknown | unknown |
| TDP | 17 W | 8 W |
Raw performance index
Raw single-thread performance estimation
- Intel Celeron 8871500 points
- Intel Atom Z37701440 points
Points - higher is better
Raw multi-thread performance estimation
- Intel Celeron 8873000 points
- Intel Atom Z37703520 points
Points - higher is better
Synthetic benchmarks
GeekBench 3 (32-bit Multi Core)
- Intel Celeron 8871942
- Intel Atom Z37702835
points - higher is better
GeekBench 3 (32-bit Single Core)
- Intel Celeron 8871151
- Intel Atom Z3770922
points - higher is better
3DMark06 CPU
- Intel Celeron 8871414
- Intel Atom Z37702212
points - higher is better
Cinebench R10 32Bit Single
- Intel Celeron 8871877
- Intel Atom Z37701189
points - higher is better
Cinebench R10 32Bit Multi
- Intel Celeron 8873597
- Intel Atom Z37703961
points - higher is better
SuperPI 1M
- Intel Celeron 88728
- Intel Atom Z377036
seconds - lower is better
wPrime 32
- Intel Celeron 88748
- Intel Atom Z377026.55
seconds - lower is better
WinRAR 4.0
- Intel Celeron 887986
- Intel Atom Z3770898
MB/s - higher is better
TrueCrypt AES
- Intel Celeron 8870.1
- Intel Atom Z37700.86
GB/s
TrueCrypt Twofish
- Intel Celeron 8870.08
- Intel Atom Z37700.18
GB/s