Processor comparison
Intel Atom Z3770 vs Intel Pentium G860
Intel
Intel Atom Z3770
Intel BGA1380
1467 MHz
4 cores
Sep 2013
MOBILE
VS
Intel
Intel Pentium G860
Intel Socket 1155
3000 MHz
2 cores
Sep 2011
DESKTOP
Summary
Synthetic performance index
- Intel Atom Z3770100%
- Intel Pentium G860152%
Relative performance
Single thread performance index
- Intel Atom Z3770100%
- Intel Pentium G860223%
Relative performance
Multi thread performance index
- Intel Atom Z3770100%
- Intel Pentium G860125%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom Z3770
- 57 watts lower power draw.
- This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium G860
- Much higher single threaded performance (around 123% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
- Much higher multi threaded performance (around 25% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
- Around 52% higher average synthetic performance.
Gaming
HWSpot recommends the Intel Pentium G860
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
HWSpot recommends the Intel Pentium G860
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Specifications
Features
| Intel Atom Z3770 | Intel Pentium G860 |
| MMX | | |
| SSE | | |
| SSE2 | | |
| SSE3 | | |
| SSSE3 | | |
| EIST | | |
| XD bit | | |
| BPT | | |
| SSE4.2 | | |
| AVX | | |
| Intel 64 | | |
| VT-x | | |
| AES-NI | | |
Architecture
| Intel Atom Z3770 | Intel Pentium G860 |
| Architecture | Intel_Silvermont | Intel_SandyBridge |
| Market | Mobile | Desktop |
| Memory Support | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Codename | Bay Trail-T | Sandy Bridge |
| Release Date | Sep 2013 | Sep 2011 |
Cores
| Intel Atom Z3770 | Intel Pentium G860 |
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| SMPs | 1 | 1 |
| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Cache
| Intel Atom Z3770 | Intel Pentium G860 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 0 KB | 3072 KB (shared) |
Physical
| Intel Atom Z3770 | Intel Pentium G860 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1380 | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | unknown |
| Package | FC-BGA1380 | FC-LGA10 |
| Die Size | unknown | 131mm² |
| Process | 22 nm | 32 nm |
Performance
| Intel Atom Z3770 | Intel Pentium G860 |
| Cpu Frequency | 1467 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 2400 MHz | none |
| Base Clock | 133 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Voltage | unknown | unknown |
| TDP | 8 W | 65 W |
Raw performance index
Raw single-thread performance estimation
- Intel Atom Z37701440 points
- Intel Pentium G8603000 points
Points - higher is better
Raw multi-thread performance estimation
- Intel Atom Z37703520 points
- Intel Pentium G8606000 points
Points - higher is better
Synthetic benchmarks
3DMark06 CPU
- Intel Atom Z37702212
- Intel Pentium G8603065
points - higher is better
Cinebench R10 32Bit Single
- Intel Atom Z37701189
- Intel Pentium G8603964
points - higher is better
Cinebench R10 32Bit Multi
- Intel Atom Z37703961
- Intel Pentium G8607695
points - higher is better
SuperPI 1M
- Intel Atom Z377036
- Intel Pentium G86013.1
seconds - lower is better
wPrime 32
- Intel Atom Z377026.55
- Intel Pentium G86023.6
seconds - lower is better
WinRAR 4.0
- Intel Atom Z3770898
- Intel Pentium G8601655
MB/s - higher is better
x264 Pass 1
- Intel Atom Z377040.49
- Intel Pentium G86070.31
FPS - higher is better
x264 Pass 2
- Intel Atom Z37707.65
- Intel Pentium G86012.69
FPS - higher is better
TrueCrypt AES
- Intel Atom Z37700.86
- Intel Pentium G8600.23
GB/s
TrueCrypt Twofish
- Intel Atom Z37700.18
- Intel Pentium G8600.18
GB/s
TrueCrypt Serpent
- Intel Atom Z37700.12
- Intel Pentium G8600.1
GB/s