Share

Processor comparison

AMD E-240 vs Intel Atom E3815

AMD

AMD E-240

AMD Socket FT1 1500 MHz 1 cores Jan 2011 MOBILE
AMD E-240
Intel

Intel Atom E3815

Intel BGA1170 1467 MHz 1 cores Oct 2013 MOBILE
Intel Atom E3815

Summary

Reasons to consider the AMD E-240

  • Higher theoretical single-threaded performance, based on raw specifications plus core architecture.
  • Higher theoretical multi-threaded performance, based on specifications plus core architecture.
  • Higher overall performance, based on specifications plus core architecture.

Reasons to consider the Intel Atom E3815

  • This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
AMD E-240
Gaming

HWSpot recommends the AMD E-240

Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.

AMD E-240
Productivity

HWSpot recommends the AMD E-240

Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.

Specifications

Features

AMD E-240Intel Atom E3815
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
EIST
XD bit
BPT
NX

Architecture

AMD E-240Intel Atom E3815
ArchitectureAMD BobcatIntel_Silvermont
MarketMobileMobile
Memory SupportunknownDDR3
CodenameZacateBay Trail-I
Release DateJan 2011Oct 2013

Cores

AMD E-240Intel Atom E3815
Cores11
Threads11
SMPs11
Integrated GraphicsRadeon HD 6310HD Graphics

Cache

AMD E-240Intel Atom E3815
L1 Cache64 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 Cache0 KB0 KB

Physical

AMD E-240Intel Atom E3815
SocketAMD Socket FT1Intel BGA1170
Max Case Tempunknownunknown
PackageFC-BGA1170
Die Size75mm²unknown
Process40 nm22 nm

Performance

AMD E-240Intel Atom E3815
Cpu Frequency1500 MHz1467 MHz
Turbo Clocknonenone
Base Clock100 MHz133 MHz
Voltage1.35 Vunknown
TDP18 W5 W

Raw performance index

Raw single-thread performance estimation

  • AMD E-2401500 points
  • Intel Atom E3815880 points

Points - higher is better

Raw multi-thread performance estimation

  • AMD E-2401500 points
  • Intel Atom E3815880 points

Points - higher is better

Similar comparisons