Processor comparison
AMD E-240 vs AMD Z-01
AMD
AMD E-240
AMD Socket FT1
1500 MHz
1 cores
Jan 2011
MOBILE
VS
AMD
AMD Z-01
AMD Socket FT1
1000 MHz
2 cores
Jun 2011
MOBILE
Summary
Synthetic performance index
- AMD E-240100%
- AMD Z-01115%
Relative performance
Single thread performance index
- AMD E-240119%
- AMD Z-01100%
Relative performance
Multi thread performance index
- AMD E-240100%
- AMD Z-01148%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider the AMD E-240
- 19% higher single threaded performance.
Reasons to consider the AMD Z-01
- Much higher multi threaded performance (around 48% higher). This allows for higher performance in professional applications like encoding or heavy multitasking.
Gaming
No clear winner declared
Productivity
HWSpot recommends the AMD Z-01
Based on productivity benchmarks, overall multithreaded performance and theoretical specifications.
Specifications
Architecture
| AMD E-240 | AMD Z-01 |
| Architecture | AMD Bobcat | AMD Bobcat |
| Market | Mobile | Mobile |
| Memory Support | unknown | unknown |
| Codename | Zacate | Desna |
| Release Date | Jan 2011 | Jun 2011 |
Cores
| AMD E-240 | AMD Z-01 |
| Cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| SMPs | 1 | 1 |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 6310 | Radeon HD 6250 |
Cache
| AMD E-240 | AMD Z-01 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 1024 KB |
| L3 Cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Physical
| AMD E-240 | AMD Z-01 |
| Socket | AMD Socket FT1 | AMD Socket FT1 |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | unknown |
| Package | | |
| Die Size | 75mm² | unknown |
| Process | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Performance
| AMD E-240 | AMD Z-01 |
| Cpu Frequency | 1500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | none | none |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Voltage | 1.35 V | unknown |
| TDP | 18 W | 6 W |
Raw performance index
Raw single-thread performance estimation
- AMD E-2401500 points
- AMD Z-011000 points
Points - higher is better
Raw multi-thread performance estimation
- AMD E-2401500 points
- AMD Z-012000 points
Points - higher is better
Synthetic benchmarks
GeekBench 3 (32-bit Multi Core)
points - higher is better
GeekBench 3 (32-bit Single Core)
points - higher is better