Processor comparison
AMD C-70 vs AMD Z-60
AMD
AMD C-70
AMD Socket FT1
1000 MHz
2 cores
Sep 2012
MOBILE
VS
AMD
AMD Z-60
AMD Socket FT1
1000 MHz
2 cores
Oct 2012
MOBILE
Summary
Synthetic performance index
Relative performance
Single thread performance index
Relative performance
Multi thread performance index
Relative performance
Reasons to consider the AMD C-70
- Much higher single threaded performance (around 23% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
- 11% higher multi threaded performance.
- Around 17% higher average synthetic performance.
Reasons to consider the AMD Z-60
Gaming
HWSpot recommends the AMD C-70
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Specifications
Architecture
| AMD C-70 | AMD Z-60 |
| Architecture | AMD Bobcat | AMD Bobcat |
| Market | Mobile | Mobile |
| Memory Support | unknown | unknown |
| Codename | Ontario | Hondo |
| Release Date | Sep 2012 | Oct 2012 |
Cores
| AMD C-70 | AMD Z-60 |
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| SMPs | 1 | 1 |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 6290 | Radeon HD 6250 |
Cache
| AMD C-70 | AMD Z-60 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1024 KB |
| L3 Cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Physical
| AMD C-70 | AMD Z-60 |
| Socket | AMD Socket FT1 | AMD Socket FT1 |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | unknown |
| Package | | |
| Die Size | 75mm² | unknown |
| Process | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Performance
| AMD C-70 | AMD Z-60 |
| Cpu Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | 1333 MHz | none |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Voltage | 1.35 V | unknown |
| TDP | 9 W | 5 W |
Raw performance index
Raw single-thread performance estimation
- AMD C-701333 points
- AMD Z-601000 points
Points - higher is better
Raw multi-thread performance estimation
- AMD C-702000 points
- AMD Z-602000 points
Points - higher is better
Synthetic benchmarks
Cinebench R10 32Bit Single
points - higher is better
Cinebench R10 32Bit Multi
points - higher is better
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
points - higher is better
Cinebench R11.5 64Bit
points - higher is better
SuperPI 1M
seconds - lower is better
wPrime 32
seconds - lower is better