Processor comparison
AMD C-50 vs AMD C-70
AMD
AMD C-50
AMD Socket FT1
1000 MHz
2 cores
Jan 2011
MOBILE
VS
AMD
AMD C-70
AMD Socket FT1
1000 MHz
2 cores
Sep 2012
MOBILE
Summary
Synthetic performance index
Relative performance
Single thread performance index
Relative performance
Multi thread performance index
Relative performance
Reasons to consider the AMD C-50
Reasons to consider the AMD C-70
- Much higher single threaded performance (around 21% higher), makes a noticeable performance difference in gaming and the majority of applications.
- 10% higher multi threaded performance.
- This is a newer product, it might have better application compatibility/performance (check features chart below).
- Around 15% higher average synthetic performance.
Gaming
HWSpot recommends the AMD C-70
Based on game and synthetic benchmarks, and theoretical specifications.
Productivity
No clear winner declared
Specifications
Architecture
| AMD C-50 | AMD C-70 |
| Architecture | AMD Bobcat | AMD Bobcat |
| Market | Mobile | Mobile |
| Memory Support | unknown | unknown |
| Codename | Ontario | Ontario |
| Release Date | Jan 2011 | Sep 2012 |
Cores
| AMD C-50 | AMD C-70 |
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| SMPs | 1 | 1 |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 6250 | Radeon HD 6290 |
Cache
| AMD C-50 | AMD C-70 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Physical
| AMD C-50 | AMD C-70 |
| Socket | AMD Socket FT1 | AMD Socket FT1 |
| Max Case Temp | unknown | unknown |
| Package | | |
| Die Size | 75mm² | 75mm² |
| Process | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Performance
| AMD C-50 | AMD C-70 |
| Cpu Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Turbo Clock | none | 1333 MHz |
| Base Clock | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Voltage | 1.35 V | 1.35 V |
| TDP | 9 W | 9 W |
Raw performance index
Raw single-thread performance estimation
- AMD C-501000 points
- AMD C-701333 points
Points - higher is better
Raw multi-thread performance estimation
- AMD C-502000 points
- AMD C-702000 points
Points - higher is better
Synthetic benchmarks
GeekBench 3 (32-bit Multi Core)
points - higher is better
GeekBench 3 (32-bit Single Core)
points - higher is better
3DMark06 CPU
points - higher is better
Cinebench R10 32Bit Single
points - higher is better
Cinebench R10 32Bit Multi
- AMD C-501281.5
- AMD C-701495
points - higher is better
Cinebench R11.5 64Bit
points - higher is better
SuperPI 1M
seconds - lower is better
wPrime 32
- AMD C-50111.21
- AMD C-7098.16
seconds - lower is better